FairShare evidence summary
Burnout and Compassion Fatigue
Original source published:
The bottom line
The national CRNA professional association itself treats burnout as a systemic, setting-dependent problem — distinct from compassion fatigue — and is investing in coalition-level wellness infrastructure. Leaders can cite this to show that burnout response is now a professional-standards expectation for nurse anesthesia, not an optional perk. As an institutional resource page, it signals professional consensus rather than new evidence.
What the source found
AANA clinical resource page citing burnout prevalence estimates of 12.5–72% depending on practice setting; distinguishes burnout (systemic) from compassion fatigue; describes national-level wellness initiatives including ALL IN coalition and 2025 Wellness Ambassador program.
Limitations and applicability
Not primary research; institutional resource page; date of last update uncertain; range of prevalence estimates reflects heterogeneous underlying studies.
Population and setting
CRNAs
Used in FairShare guides
About this evidence
Research question / practical issue
How does this source inform Understanding Anesthesia Burnout and Evidence-Based Wellness for the population it studied?
Study design, evidence tier, and source class
Society Resource · guidance source · evidence tier 1
Source type: Society Resource · guidance · Evidence tier 1
Topics: Understanding Anesthesia Burnout, Evidence-Based Wellness
Audience: CRNAs, Wellness Leaders